[2:59:06p 3/27/10] <Prod> !logon
[2:59:12p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Awesome
[2:59:19p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Thanks for coming everyone.
[2:59:30p 3/27/10] <Procyon> We're an hour behind, and I don't have a preamble,
[2:59:37p 3/27/10] <Procyon> so we'll just kick this off.
[2:59:50p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Prod, which topic do you want to start with?
[2:59:54p 3/27/10] <Prod> so
[2:59:58p 3/27/10] <Prod> a few "announcements"
[3:00:03p 3/27/10] <Prod> We now have a noticeboard
[3:00:19p 3/27/10] <Prod> found http://strategywiki.org/wiki/StrategyWiki:Noticeboard
[3:00:32p 3/27/10] <Prod> it's easily viewable from the community portal llink on the left
[3:00:42p 3/27/10] <Prod> everyone should either watchlist the noticeboard
[3:00:50p 3/27/10] <Prod> or check CP every now and then
[3:00:58p 3/27/10] <Prod> it isn't protected
[3:01:09p 3/27/10] <Prod> so anyone can add notices, and there's a handy edit link on the CP as well
[3:01:21p 3/27/10] <Prod> if you do something you feel might interest the community, feel free to post
[3:01:39p 3/27/10] <Prod> you can see a few examples already there
[3:01:55p 3/27/10] <Prod> things like melon's contests, or questionable deletion notices
[3:02:01p 3/27/10] <Prod> not really any more guidelines than that
[3:02:18p 3/27/10] <Prod> questions/concerns?
[3:02:30p 3/27/10] <ness> nope.
[3:02:31p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Thanks very much for setting that up Prod.
[3:02:39p 3/27/10] <Garrett> will old notices be archived or just removed?
[3:02:42p 3/27/10] <Prod> joint effor with naj :)
[3:02:43p 3/27/10] <Prod> removed
[3:02:54p 3/27/10] <Prod> we haven't decided on a timespan
[3:03:03p 3/27/10] <Garrett> right
[3:03:03p 3/27/10] <Prod> but whenever it looks like it's getting long we'll trim it
[3:03:14p 3/27/10] <Prod> or just aren't relevant anymore
[3:03:43p 3/27/10] <Prod> ok
[3:03:46p 3/27/10] <Prod> next up
[3:03:49p 3/27/10] <Prod> New facebook page
[3:03:56p 3/27/10] <Prod> anyone on facebook
[3:03:58p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Ah yes :)
[3:03:59p 3/27/10] <Prod> can fan this page
[3:04:00p 3/27/10] <Prod> http://www.facebook.com/pages/StrategyWiki/349874845973
[3:04:08p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Can anyone post msgs?
[3:04:15p 3/27/10] <Prod> anyone can send to it
[3:04:17p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I've been posting links to guides I finish,
[3:04:20p 3/27/10] <Prod> like trevor
[3:04:22p 3/27/10] <Procyon> OK,
[3:04:27p 3/27/10] <Procyon> then I hope everyone will do so.
[3:04:30p 3/27/10] <Prod> agree
[3:04:34p 3/27/10] -Procyon- goes to it
[3:04:41p 3/27/10] <Prod> if people want to post _as_ sw
[3:04:58p 3/27/10] <Prod> let me or procyon know, and we'll make you admins
[3:05:04p 3/27/10] <Prod> for the moment
[3:05:08p 3/27/10] <Prod> we'll stick to sysop and higher
[3:05:13p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Oh, here: Here is this week's summary for the Facebook Page: StrategyWiki +7 Fans this week (21 total Fans) Wall Posts, Comments, and Likes this week ( last week) 49 Visits to your page this week (68 Visits last week)
[3:05:36p 3/27/10] <Prod> i would suggest everyone invite all their friends :D
[3:05:51p 3/27/10] <Prod> about 16 of the people already in the group are my friends :P
[3:05:54p 3/27/10] <Prod> i spammed them all :D
[3:05:57p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Please do
[3:06:17p 3/27/10] <Prod> as a bonus
[3:06:23p 3/27/10] <Prod> anything posted _as_ strategywiki
[3:06:28p 3/27/10] <Prod> also gets posted to the twitter page
[3:06:28p 3/27/10] <Prod> http://twitter.com/StrategyWiki
[3:06:38p 3/27/10] <Prod> feel free to follow it :)
[3:06:46p 3/27/10] <ness> for the facebook
[3:06:47p 3/27/10] <ness> group
[3:07:10p 3/27/10] <ness> I suggest that we rename it so that it perhaps includes something like The game walkthrough wiki or something
[3:07:12p 3/27/10] <ness> otherwise
[3:07:13p 3/27/10] <Procyon> We need to get Teddy to develop a logo
[3:07:18p 3/27/10] <ness> the majority of people wont know what the group is about.
[3:07:23p 3/27/10] <Prod> facebook group is being deleted
[3:07:30p 3/27/10] <ness> oh?
[3:07:35p 3/27/10] <ness> Is another one going in its place?
[3:07:46p 3/27/10] <Prod> so facebook has two types of these things
[3:07:48p 3/27/10] <Prod> there's the group
[3:07:50p 3/27/10] <Procyon> The fanpage replaces the group page
[3:07:51p 3/27/10] <Prod> and then there's the page
[3:07:53p 3/27/10] <ness> right
[3:07:58p 3/27/10] <Prod> so you're saying
[3:08:17p 3/27/10] <Prod> rename to StrategyWiki - the free strategy guide and walkthrough wiki?
[3:08:31p 3/27/10] <Procyon> http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pages/StrategyWiki/349874845973?v=wall&ref=sgm
[3:08:35p 3/27/10] <Prod> i'm not actually sure if we can change the name anymore
[3:08:38p 3/27/10] <ness> Yeah. Gamers will definitely want to check it out in that case...
[3:08:41p 3/27/10] <Prod> once people join
[3:08:45p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Plus, it says that in the description
[3:08:49p 3/27/10] <Prod> yea
[3:08:59p 3/27/10] <Prod> oh look, an update!
[3:09:04p 3/27/10] <Procyon> "Detailed Info cancel EditEdit Detailed Info Website: http://strategywiki.org Mission: A collaborative and freely-licensed wiki for all your video game strategy guide and walkthrough needs!"
[3:09:14p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Hehe, guilty
[3:09:34p 3/27/10] <Prod> we have a new twitter follower as well :D
[3:09:39p 3/27/10] <ness> It might be in the desc, but when a friend fans a page and that gets advertised in his social network
[3:09:45p 3/27/10] <Procyon> But I want everyone to promote their guides on there.
[3:09:45p 3/27/10] <ness> do we know if the description is included?
[3:09:48p 3/27/10] <ness> because I dont think so...
[3:10:05p 3/27/10] <Prod> 12(ness12): unfortunately we can't change the name without clearing out the group
[3:10:11p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Ness: I'm not certain either. we can investigate it.
[3:10:22p 3/27/10] <Prod> additionally for twitter
[3:10:29p 3/27/10] <ness> well, there are only 23 people at the moment
[3:10:33p 3/27/10] <Prod> if anyone wants to post anything to the twitter page
[3:10:33p 3/27/10] <ness> and we need a page anyway
[3:10:34p 3/27/10] <ness> right?
[3:10:34p 3/27/10] <Prod> http://strategywiki.org/wiki/Special:Twitterupdate
[3:10:38p 3/27/10] <Prod> you can do so through that
[3:10:39p 3/27/10] <Prod> special page
[3:10:54p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Nice job
[3:10:54p 3/27/10] <Prod> 12(ness12): that's more than we ever got from the group
[3:11:25p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Ness: I agree with your concern, but we can find other ways to emphasize the point of the site.
[3:11:26p 3/27/10] <ness> Ah, I see. I think the group would have more advertising potential if it were to include that description in its title
[3:11:33p 3/27/10] <ness> hm
[3:11:40p 3/27/10] <Prod> we'll have to see how it shows up for peopel
[3:11:42p 3/27/10] <ness> okay. well need to research that
[3:11:43p 3/27/10] <ness> right
[3:11:57p 3/27/10] <Procyon> The SW page is more "official"
[3:12:03p 3/27/10] <Prod> yea
[3:12:12p 3/27/10] <ness> oh, so this page already exists.
[3:12:22p 3/27/10] <ness> mmkay.
[3:12:55p 3/27/10] <Prod> any other q's?
[3:13:22p 3/27/10] <Prod> ok
[3:13:23p 3/27/10] <Prod> next up
[3:13:27p 3/27/10] <Prod> the WIP Bot
[3:13:38p 3/27/10] <Prod> as you guys know (and some are guilty of)
[3:13:45p 3/27/10] <Prod> people put wip templates on pages
[3:13:51p 3/27/10] <Prod> and then never take them down
[3:14:08p 3/27/10] <Prod> so, i've now got a bot that will go through and check when the last update was
[3:14:15p 3/27/10] <Prod> and if it was greater than a certain time
[3:14:18p 3/27/10] <Prod> untag it for wip
[3:14:37p 3/27/10] <Prod> http://strategywiki.org/wiki/Category:Works_in_progress
[3:14:56p 3/27/10] <Prod> so to test, i ran it saying the certain time was 1 year
[3:14:57p 3/27/10] <Prod> ie
[3:15:03p 3/27/10] <Prod> if it wasn't modified in over a year, detag it
[3:15:18p 3/27/10] <Prod> that seems a bit long
[3:15:28p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I agree
[3:15:30p 3/27/10] <Prod> cause if it hasn't been edited in 9 months, it isn't really "in progress"
[3:15:41p 3/27/10] <Prod> so what do people think would be a good period to choose?
[3:15:53p 3/27/10] <Procyon> 2 or 3 months?
[3:16:26p 3/27/10] <Prod> Moydow, Jon, thoughts?
[3:16:31p 3/27/10] <ness> i think thats good
[3:16:35p 3/27/10] <Jon> Two months sounds good to me.
[3:16:37p 3/27/10] <ness> 2 months even.
[3:16:44p 3/27/10] <Prod> all agree for 2 months?
[3:16:52p 3/27/10] <ness> yes
[3:17:13p 3/27/10] <Prod> ok, i'll run it for two months old pages later today
[3:17:21p 3/27/10] <Procyon> terrific
[3:17:25p 3/27/10] <Prod> i'll run it weekly for now, may set it to be done automatically
[3:17:33p 3/27/10] <Prod> as a cron job or something
-- Moydow has left the server.
-- Moydow has left the server.
-- Moydow has left the server.
-- Moydow has left the server.
[3:18:08p 3/27/10] <Prod> next up
[3:18:27p 3/27/10] <Prod> it's the time of month to pick a collaboration
[3:18:32p 3/27/10] <Prod> http://strategywiki.org/wiki/StrategyWiki:Collaboration_of_the_Month
[3:18:48p 3/27/10] <Prod> please vote now, and we'll tally them and pick one at the end of the meeting
[3:19:33p 3/27/10] <Prod> ok, now for the real meat
[3:19:38p 3/27/10] <Prod> digital distributors
[3:19:47p 3/27/10] <Prod> copy of the discussion is here
[3:19:48p 3/27/10] <Prod> http://abxy.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=27128
[3:20:09p 3/27/10] <Prod> 12(Garrett12): you were directly involved with the discussion
[3:20:23p 3/27/10] <Procyon> oh yes
[3:20:26p 3/27/10] <Prod> can you give us a short version of what will change?
[3:20:33p 3/27/10] <Garrett> najzere's proposal is that digital distributors be treated as distributors, rather than "systems".
[3:20:56p 3/27/10] <Prod> so we move it to the "distributor" field?
[3:21:00p 3/27/10] <Garrett> basically yes
[3:21:02p 3/27/10] <Garrett> e.g. Xbox Live Arcade would become a distributor for XBLA games rather than a distinct platform from the 360 itself.
[3:21:24p 3/27/10] <Garrett> this means that games for a platform would be in the parent category regardless of their method of distribution
[3:21:38p 3/27/10] <Prod> so it would say xbla would be the distributor
-- Moydow has joined in the meeting.
[3:21:51p 3/27/10] <Prod> but xbox 360 would be the system?
[3:22:06p 3/27/10] <Garrett> yeah
[3:22:19p 3/27/10] <Prod> what about the achievemetn cats?
[3:22:24p 3/27/10] <Prod> they're kinda like "achievements for system"
[3:22:25p 3/27/10] <Garrett> those would change too
[3:22:35p 3/27/10] <Prod> how so?
[3:22:54p 3/27/10] <Garrett> it doesn't really matter whether say a 360 game is retail or XBLA, it still is gamerscore and whatnot.
[3:23:06p 3/27/10] <Prod> it doesn't show up differently?
[3:23:14p 3/27/10] <Garrett> no
[3:23:23p 3/27/10] <Prod> http://strategywiki.org/wiki/Category:Achievements
[3:23:33p 3/27/10] <Prod> so psn trophies would disappear
[3:23:37p 3/27/10] <Garrett> yeah
[3:23:40p 3/27/10] <Prod> and xbla achievements would disappear
[3:23:43p 3/27/10] <Garrett> yeah
[3:24:00p 3/27/10] <Prod> but be merged into the relevant ps3/x360 cat
[3:24:01p 3/27/10] <Garrett> it also solves the problem of multi-platform DD services such as PSN and soon to be Steam.
[3:24:02p 3/27/10] <Garrett> yeah
[3:24:08p 3/27/10] <Prod> yea
[3:24:16p 3/27/10] <Prod> what about when ps4 comes out
[3:24:16p 3/27/10] <Procyon> nice
[3:24:21p 3/27/10] <Procyon> lol
[3:24:27p 3/27/10] <Prod> and all the psn trophies are available there as well?
[3:24:49p 3/27/10] <Prod> do we recategorize them all as ps4 trophies as well?
[3:24:56p 3/27/10] <Garrett> PS4 games would be listed as PS4 games.
[3:24:59p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Wouldn't that be a "cross that bridge when we come to it" situation?
[3:25:07p 3/27/10] <Prod> planning ahead :D
[3:25:24p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Actually, yeah, I agree with Garrett, PS4 games should be independant.
[3:25:26p 3/27/10] <Garrett> right now PS4 DD games would just go into the same cat as PS3 and PSP DD games
[3:25:41p 3/27/10] <Prod> true
[3:25:43p 3/27/10] <Prod> well
[3:25:45p 3/27/10] <Garrett> this solves more problems than it creates I should think.
[3:25:48p 3/27/10] <Prod> any other thoughts/questions/concerns?
[3:26:01p 3/27/10] <Prod> anyone against?
[3:26:08p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I'm cool with it.
[3:26:12p 3/27/10] <Prod> i like it too
[3:26:20p 3/27/10] <Prod> i guess this will be a slowly done bot takeover?
[3:26:54p 3/27/10] <Garrett> via AWB
[3:27:07p 3/27/10] <Garrett> since there will need to be human cleanup for a lot of it
[3:27:43p 3/27/10] <Prod> let me chekck what kind of traffic those pages get
[3:28:00p 3/27/10] <Prod> the cat pages
[3:28:08p 3/27/10] <Prod> i don't want to delete them immediately if people are still using them
[3:28:25p 3/27/10] <Garrett> you mean the achievement cats?
[3:28:31p 3/27/10] <Prod> yea
[3:28:53p 3/27/10] <Prod> ok
[3:28:59p 3/27/10] <Prod> neither get more than 3 or 4 views per day
[3:29:02p 3/27/10] <Prod> they'll survive
[3:29:10p 3/27/10] <Prod> the people will survive without the cats
[3:29:27p 3/27/10] <Prod> so, lets go ahead with this
[3:29:41p 3/27/10] <Prod> and we'll figure out how to go about it on the talk page
[3:30:07p 3/27/10] <Prod> ok, next discussion
[3:30:10p 3/27/10] <Prod> ratings categories
[3:30:14p 3/27/10] <Prod> http://abxy.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=26798
[3:30:19p 3/27/10] <Prod> it's been a while since this one came up
[3:30:23p 3/27/10] <Prod> so i'll give you guys a few minutes
[3:30:25p 3/27/10] <Prod> to read up
[3:31:17p 3/27/10] <Garrett> is this useful?
[3:31:29p 3/27/10] <Prod> searching for games rated ESRB T
[3:31:30p 3/27/10] <Prod> or R
[3:31:32p 3/27/10] <Prod> or whatever
[3:31:37p 3/27/10] <Prod> i'm somewhat undecded
[3:31:57p 3/27/10] <Procyon> It has to be more useful than the month/date categories :P
[3:32:03p 3/27/10] <Prod> no wai
[3:32:04p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Or the Single Player category.
[3:32:09p 3/27/10] <Prod> i can check what was released on my birthday!
[3:32:09p 3/27/10] <Garrett> :D
[3:32:19p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Oh wow, I never did that :o
[3:32:23p 3/27/10] -Procyon- checks
[3:32:45p 3/27/10] <Prod> here's the two options i saw
[3:32:46p 3/27/10] <Prod> * Category for each rating for each rating level. ([[Category:ESRB R]], [[Category:ESRB T]], etc.)
[3:32:46p 3/27/10] <ness> For the record, I unfortunately did not budget my time for this meeting and Ill be on my way out. Hope to work with you guys soon -- and let me know if theres anything I can help with :)
[3:32:46p 3/27/10] <Prod> * Category for all games rated by certain group with section for each rating level. ([[Category:ESRB]] has sections #T, #R, etc.)
[3:32:54p 3/27/10] <ness> Bye now.
[3:33:01p 3/27/10] <Garrett> byes
[3:33:03p 3/27/10] <Prod> thnx for joining ness
[3:33:03p 3/27/10] <Prod> cya
[3:33:05p 3/27/10] <Jon> bye ness.
[3:33:06p 3/27/10] <ness> no problem
[3:33:07p 3/27/10] <ness> bye
-- ness has left the server.
-- ness has left the server.
-- ness has left the server.
-- ness has left the server.
[3:33:20p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Hey, Guitar Hero and WoW came out on my birthday.
[3:33:37p 3/27/10] <Prod> a popular day :D
[3:33:37p 3/27/10] <Prod> now
[3:33:43p 3/27/10] <Prod> the 2nd option i mentioned above
[3:33:48p 3/27/10] <Jon> DMC and a Phoenix Wright game came out on mine, haha.
[3:33:59p 3/27/10] <Procyon> nice :)
[3:33:59p 3/27/10] <Prod> should be easier on categories
[3:34:18p 3/27/10] <Prod> ie. 10x fewer categories
[3:34:25p 3/27/10] <Prod> but the 1st one "kinda" makes more sense
[3:34:27p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I agree
[3:34:32p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Oh,
[3:34:36p 3/27/10] <Prod> especially if multiple ratings use the same letter
[3:34:39p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I was in support of the second idea.
[3:34:42p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Oh wait
[3:34:44p 3/27/10] <Prod> ie. E vs. E10 plus
[3:34:45p 3/27/10] <Procyon> nvm,
[3:34:50p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I like the first idea.
[3:34:54p 3/27/10] <Prod> haha
[3:35:07p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I assume those ESRB cats would be categorized under one ESRB parent cat.
[3:35:14p 3/27/10] <Garrett> yeah
[3:35:21p 3/27/10] <Garrett> the ESRB description page would be moved there too
[3:35:37p 3/27/10] <Prod> yea
[3:35:46p 3/27/10] <Prod> so it moves out of main namespace and becomes another category page
[3:35:59p 3/27/10] <Procyon> right
[3:36:23p 3/27/10] <Prod> technically, either of the options is easily done
-- Moydow has left the server.
-- Moydow has left the server.
-- Moydow has left the server.
-- Moydow has left the server.
[3:36:56p 3/27/10] <Prod> so
[3:37:01p 3/27/10] <Prod> who's for type 1?
[3:37:33p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Ay
[3:37:43p 3/27/10] <Procyon> or is it aye?
[3:37:48p 3/27/10] <Jon> It's Aye.
[3:37:49p 3/27/10] <Prod> aye i believe :P
[3:37:50p 3/27/10] <Jon> and Aye.
[3:37:54p 3/27/10] <Prod> how about this
[3:37:59p 3/27/10] <Prod> state option 1 or option 2
[3:38:06p 3/27/10] <Procyon> op 1
[3:38:11p 3/27/10] <Jon> option 1
[3:38:20p 3/27/10] <Prod> Garrett?
[3:38:34p 3/27/10] <Garrett> which is which? >_>
[3:38:44p 3/27/10] <Prod> [[Cat:ESRB R]] = opt 1
[3:38:51p 3/27/10] <Prod> [[cat:esrb#R]] = opt 2
[3:39:11p 3/27/10] <Garrett> #R? So they would be under the letter R in the cat or what?
[3:39:15p 3/27/10] <Prod> yea
[3:39:23p 3/27/10] <Prod> [[Category:ESRB|R]]
[3:40:13p 3/27/10] <Garrett> I suppose I'd go for option 2
[3:40:35p 3/27/10] <Prod> Usage example at: http://strategywiki.org/w/index.php?tit ... mes&from=H. The link isn't exactly pretty, and #'s wouldn't work since it could still have text sections.
[3:40:46p 3/27/10] <Prod> http://strategywiki.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Games&from=H
[3:41:19p 3/27/10] <Prod> and no sorting
[3:41:27p 3/27/10] <Prod> by name
[3:41:35p 3/27/10] <Prod> unless we did something like
[3:41:41p 3/27/10] <Prod> [[Category:ESRB|R{{GAMENAME}}
[3:41:44p 3/27/10] <Prod> [[Category:ESRB|R{{GAMENAME}}]]
[3:42:03p 3/27/10] <Garrett> oh right
[3:42:07p 3/27/10] <Garrett> option 1 it is then <_<
[3:42:13p 3/27/10] <Prod> ok
[3:42:33p 3/27/10] <Prod> i'm going to assume ashley isn't going to vote :)
[3:42:43p 3/27/10] <Prod> wanderer isn't here
[3:42:52p 3/27/10] <Prod> and as he's the main proponent of table styles
[3:42:58p 3/27/10] <Prod> we'll put that off till the next meeting
[3:43:07p 3/27/10] <Prod> unless people really want to go over it now?
[3:43:30p 3/27/10] -Prod- will work on the ratings reclassification tomorrow or something
[3:43:44p 3/27/10] <Prod> ok
[3:43:50p 3/27/10] <Prod> which brings us back to the collaboration of the month
[3:44:01p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Yeah, table styles can wait
[3:44:10p 3/27/10] <Prod> there are many tied at 2 votes for
[3:44:22p 3/27/10] <Prod> please vote!
[3:44:50p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I'll pick another one :)
[3:45:30p 3/27/10] <Jon> Voted.
[3:45:41p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I picked two more.
[3:45:55p 3/27/10] <Prod> 12(Garrett12): you done voting?
[3:45:59p 3/27/10] <Jon> Oh we can vote twice
[3:46:09p 3/27/10] <Jon> (more than once)
[3:46:09p 3/27/10] <Prod> vote on everyone you support
[3:46:25p 3/27/10] <Prod> though
[3:46:30p 3/27/10] <Prod> voting on all is pointless :P
[3:46:42p 3/27/10] <Procyon> lol "gotta vote'em all"
[3:46:45p 3/27/10] <Jon> Haha
[3:46:50p 3/27/10] <Jon> I voted for all the ones I actually own.
[3:46:53p 3/27/10] <Garrett> honestly I'd suggest we select FFXIII regardless of which one gets the most votes.
[3:46:59p 3/27/10] <Garrett> new Final Fantasies don't come around every day
[3:47:09p 3/27/10] <Garrett> we have done this sort of thing in the past with other popular new relesaes
[3:47:11p 3/27/10] <Garrett> IIRC
[3:47:27p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I agree with Garrett, that was my #1 pick
[3:47:38p 3/27/10] <Jon> Yeah, what Procyon said.
[3:47:52p 3/27/10] <Procyon> ok, I think we have our game.
[3:48:26p 3/27/10] <Prod> looks like it's ff xiii
[3:48:31p 3/27/10] <Jon> :D
[3:48:46p 3/27/10] <Prod> who would like to write up the blurb?
[3:49:09p 3/27/10] <Prod> jon? :)
[3:49:22p 3/27/10] <Jon> D:
[3:49:29p 3/27/10] <Jon> What should it say?
[3:49:45p 3/27/10] <Garrett> something about the hot chick actually not being a dude this time around? ;)
[3:49:50p 3/27/10] <Prod> haha
[3:49:50p 3/27/10] <Jon> ahaha.
[3:49:59p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Thanks for the spoiler Garrett :P
[3:50:03p 3/27/10] <Prod> and the nice chick not getting stabbed through the chest!
[3:50:11p 3/27/10] <Prod> poor aeris :'(
[3:50:16p 3/27/10] <Procyon> lol
[3:50:55p 3/27/10] <Jon> [[Final Fantasy XIII]] is the newest installment in the Final Fantasy series, and the first true Final Fantasy on the Xbox 360 and PS3.
[3:51:08p 3/27/10] <Jon> Best I could come up with, based on the Pokemon R/B/Y blurb
[3:51:10p 3/27/10] <Jon> :D
[3:51:11p 3/27/10] <Prod> :D
[3:51:19p 3/27/10] <Prod> and a sentence to mention that it's the CotM
[3:51:28p 3/27/10] <Prod> we can discuss back in #strategywiki
[3:51:42p 3/27/10] <Prod> which leaves us with the last topic on the agenda
[3:51:44p 3/27/10] <Prod> scope
[3:51:45p 3/27/10] <Prod> but
[3:51:50p 3/27/10] <Prod> we're already 50 minutes over time
[3:51:57p 3/27/10] <Prod> so i'll postpone that as well to the next meeting
[3:51:59p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Yeah, I need to go soon :(
[3:52:03p 3/27/10] <Procyon> It's a huge discussion.
[3:52:15p 3/27/10] <Procyon> And I think we should twist naj's arm into coming for that one.
[3:52:17p 3/27/10] <Prod> ok, any topics people would like brought up next time?
[3:52:32p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Yeah... meeting attendance :P
[3:52:37p 3/27/10] <Prod> haha
[3:52:44p 3/27/10] <Procyon> srsly
[3:53:01p 3/27/10] <Prod> oh btw, congrats to jon for getting rollback powers
[3:53:18p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Oh, hey, just an off-topic note since by the next meeting, it will probably have already taken place,
[3:53:20p 3/27/10] <Jon> :) Thanks.
[3:53:37p 3/27/10] <Procyon> but I will be hosting the next destructoid.com Baltimore/DC community party at my house mid-April.
[3:53:45p 3/27/10] <Prod> sweet
[3:53:54p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Three days of video game playing debauchery all weekend long.
[3:54:16p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I'll post a link to the announcement on my User page.
[3:54:43p 3/27/10] <Prod> oh yea
[3:54:49p 3/27/10] <Prod> april fools day is coming up
[3:55:00p 3/27/10] <Prod> if anyone has some easy suggestions for a prank this year
[3:55:03p 3/27/10] <Prod> please let me know ;)
[3:55:10p 3/27/10] <Procyon> SW joins Wikia?
[3:55:18p 3/27/10] <Prod> haha
[3:55:21p 3/27/10] <Procyon> :D
[3:55:26p 3/27/10] <Prod> privately ;)
[3:55:29p 3/27/10] <Prod> so it'll be a surprise
[3:55:33p 3/27/10] <Procyon> I know ;)
[3:56:17p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Alright, cool.
[3:56:18p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Well,
[3:56:23p 3/27/10] <Procyon> thanks for coming everybody.
[3:56:38p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Good meeting.
[3:56:51p 3/27/10] <Prod> next meeting
[3:56:57p 3/27/10] <Prod> will be at the end of april
[3:57:04p 3/27/10] <Procyon> Sounds good.
[3:57:04p 3/27/10] <Prod> last saturday of april
[3:57:25p 3/27/10] <Prod> post topics in the forums and reply to the meeting invite if you would like it added to scope
[3:57:36p 3/27/10] <Prod> the the scope of the meeting discussion *
[3:57:37p 3/27/10] <Prod> :P
[3:58:08p 3/27/10] <Prod> cya'll next time
